![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Inaccuracies in FC
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »
b. 30-31
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
Different versions of rhythmic notation of the last third are not easy to classify in terms of authenticity and chronology. The differences between particular sources concern three elements: the tie sustaining b category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Inaccuracies in FC |
||||||||||
b. 34
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
In the 2nd half of the bar, in FC (→GE1), FE and EE1 there are no sharps raising c1 to c category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in FC |
||||||||||
b. 36
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
Same as previously, in FE, EE1 and GE1, the abbreviated notation of FC and remaining Stichvorlage manuscripts were misinterpreted in FE, EE1 and GE1, which gave the 2nd, 3rd and 4th group of semiquavers without any accidentals. The mistake was corrected in EE2 (→EE3) and GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in FC |
||||||||||
b. 36-37
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
The missing slur over the D category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Inaccuracies in FC |
||||||||||
b. 42
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
FC has most probably f category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in FC |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »