![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Scope of dynamic hairpins
b. 2-4
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
..
The pair of category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FC |
||||||||||||||||
b. 18
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
..
Moving the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||||
b. 35-38
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
..
The sources quite clearly differ in the range of We preserve the position of the signs over the part of the R.H., in accordance with the manuscripts. However, one cannot exclude that the reason for such placement could have simply been lack of space between the staves and moving them to the typical place, as it was performed in GE, is justified. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||||
b. 41-42
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
..
Same as in bars 2-4, the pair of category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , Authentic corrections of FC |
||||||||||||||||
b. 44-46
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
..
It is hard to state with certainty how the visible in A and FC difference in placement of the pair of category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins |