mUltimate Chopin

Op. 25 No 3, Etude in F major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Page: 
Source: 
p. 3, b. 33-52
p. 1, b. 1-16
p. 2, b. 17-32
p. 3, b. 33-52
p. 4, b. 53-72
Main text
Main text
GC - Gutmann's Copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected reprint of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Corrected reprint of GE1
GE1b - Flawed impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Revised impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected reprint of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
GC - Gutmann's Copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected reprint of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Corrected reprint of GE1
GE1b - Flawed impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Revised impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected reprint of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text

  b. 49-52

Dots in GC (→GE)

Wedges in FE & EE

We consider Gutmann's misunderstanding of the notation of [A] to be the most probable explanation of the difference between GC (→GE) and FE and EE. The same applies to bars 53-58 and 60-64.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Wedges, Inaccuracies in GC

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: GC, FES, EE1, EE2, EE3, FE1, FE2, GE3, FED, FEJ, GE1, GE1a, GE2, GE1b
Complete ➔