Issues : Errors in EE
|
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
The version of EE1 is almost certainly erroneous. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
||||||
|
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
In GC (→GE1), FE and EE1 there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors of GC |
||||||
|
b. 51
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
In AW, where the previous bar ended with category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
||||||
|
b. 56
|
composition: Op. 25 No 2, Etude in F minor
..
The notation of this bar is erroneous or inaccurate in the majority of the sources. Most probably, Chopin, writing this fragment in [A] for the third time (after analogous bars 6 and 25), had already such a strong correlation of the notes with the proper sound that he did not notice the missing
The cautionary category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Errors of A , Errors of GC |
2 in 
returning b
and where the introduction of the leit motif had, as it seems, a clearly different 
before the 4th quaver. Cancelling this alteration was, as usual, obvious, hence it was not marked even when the composer would correct the notation of this bar in