Page: 
Source: 
p. 5, b. 70-85
p. 1, b. 1-19
p. 2, b. 20-37
p. 3, b. 38-53
p. 4, b. 54-69
p. 5, b. 70-85
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German Edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Revised impression of GE3
GE5 - Corrected reprint of GE4
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE1
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German Edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Revised impression of GE3
GE5 - Corrected reprint of GE4
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE1
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 84-85

In FE (→GE1,EE) the engravers overlooked the staccato dots for the 1st quavers in the L.H. in bars 84 and 85. The revisers of GE2 added the overlooked signs, most probably after comparison with analogous bars 52 and 53. In GE3 (→GE4GE5) the engraver overlooked only one dot – for the quaver in bar 84. 

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE, Errors in EE, Errors in GE, GE revisions

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: FED, FEJ, FES