Page: 
Source: 
p. 3, b. 38-53
p. 1, b. 1-19
p. 2, b. 20-37
p. 3, b. 38-53
p. 4, b. 54-69
p. 5, b. 70-85
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German Edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Revised impression of GE3
GE5 - Corrected reprint of GE4
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE1
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German Edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Revised impression of GE3
GE5 - Corrected reprint of GE4
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE1
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 38

Slur in A

No slur in FE (→GE,EE)

The lack of slur to the bottom voice of the R.H. is almost certainly an arbitrary decision of the engraver of FE1, who, aiming at a faithful reproduction of the graphic layout of A (the dots and slur over the notes, between the R.H. voices), was not able to fit the slur in a legible manner. 

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: FED, FEJ, FES