mUltimate Chopin

Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Page: 
Source: 
p. 3, b. 38-53
p. 1, b. 1-19
p. 2, b. 20-37
p. 3, b. 38-53
p. 4, b. 54-69
p. 5, b. 70-85
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German Edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Revised impression of GE3
GE5 - Corrected reprint of GE4
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE1
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German Edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Revised impression of GE3
GE5 - Corrected reprint of GE4
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE1
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text

  b. 38

Dots in A (→FE→EE)

No last dot in GE1

No dots in GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5)

The absence of the last staccato dot for the bottom voice of the R.H. is undoubtedly a result of an inaccuracy of the engraver of GE1. In turn, the oversight of all dots in GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5) is probably a revision.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE, GE revisions

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: FED, FEJ, FES
Complete ➔