Issues : FE revisions
|
b. 3
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
The staccato dots for the 2nd chord are rather non-authentic. They were most probably added by the revisers, perhaps as a result of misinterpretation of A – one can see a minor fleck of ink between the beam and note head of the lowest note in the R.H. Moreover, the signs were added inconsistently: FE (→GE1) includes dots only the first time (in GE1 only over the R.H.), yet they are absent in the repetition. The revisers of EE and GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5) added dots in both situations. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , FE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 13-79
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
In the editions, almost all signs of accents were represented as short accents – the engraver of FE (→GE1) correctly placed the only long accent in bar 63, yet in EE and GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5) it was changed to a short one. According to us, the notation of the majority of the accents of A clearly indicates their interpretation as long accents. Apart from the aforementioned, in the manuscript there is a specific for Chopin, rarely present sign of an inverted long accent – see bar 47. category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Long accents , EE revisions , GE revisions , FE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 44
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
In A (→FE1) Chopin wrote cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources issues: FE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 76
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , FE revisions |
for d
2 and d
