![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : GE revisions
b. 7
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
In GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5) the beginning of the slur was arbitrarily moved over the 1st note of the bar, where the previous slur simultaneously ends. Similarly in bar 32. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 9
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
The slur over the triplet, written by Chopin in A, may be considered a phrasing element. FE (→GE1,EE) features this slur only in the repetition. In turn, in GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5) the revisers treated it as an indication of an irregular group - placing it in both places only over the digit and shortening it accordingly. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 11
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we give the category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 13-17
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
In A Chopin most probably introduced a staccato dot for the 1st quaver in the L.H. in bar 13 and certainly in bar 17. Both signs were included in FE. As bar 15 is generally a repetition of bar 13, the absence of the dot in the analogous place can be considered Chopin's oversight. In turn, as a result of an unquestionable oversight of the engraver, in GE1 there is no dot in bar 17 – the sign was already in FE. To the main text we adopt the complete articulation of GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5). category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||
b. 13-79
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
In the editions, almost all signs of accents were represented as short accents – the engraver of FE (→GE1) correctly placed the only long accent in bar 63, yet in EE and GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5) it was changed to a short one. According to us, the notation of the majority of the accents of A clearly indicates their interpretation as long accents. Apart from the aforementioned, in the manuscript there is a specific for Chopin, rarely present sign of an inverted long accent – see bar 47. category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Long accents , EE revisions , GE revisions , FE revisions |