Page: 
Source: 
p. 4, b. 39-50
p. 1, b. 1-12
p. 2, b. 13-26
p. 3, b. 27-38
p. 4, b. 39-50
p. 5, b. 51-65
p. 6, b. 66-82
Main text
Main text
AI - Working autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Corrected impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
GE5 - Fifth German edition
EE - English edition
EE2 - First English edition
EE3 - Corrected impression of EE2
EE4 - Revised impression of EE3
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
AI - Working autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Corrected impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
GE5 - Fifth German edition
EE - English edition
EE2 - First English edition
EE3 - Corrected impression of EE2
EE4 - Revised impression of EE3
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 47-50

Slur in AI

Slurs in FE (→GE1GE1aGE2), contextual interpretation; slurs in GE3 (→GE4GE5)

Slurs in EE

Our suggestion

In AI the slur in these bars starts only on the last group of semiquavers in bar 50. The slurring of FE is complete, yet unclear – in bars 47 and 49, at the end of the line, the slurs are clearly extended, suggesting continuation. However, the slurs in bars 48 and 50, starting from the 1st semiquaver, do not confirm this suggestion. This ambiguity was revised both in GE, by clearly combining the slurs (in the previous GE the slurs were combined only in bars 49-50), and in EE, in which each bar is provided with a separate slur. We suggest here one slur, as breaking the slur at the beginning of bar 49 could also have been caused by misunderstanding of the notation of [A] (perhaps inaccurate due to the abbreviated notation?).

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues:

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: AI, FE1, FE2, FED, FEJ, FES, GE1a, GE2, GE3, GE4, GE5, EE2, EE3, EE4, GE1