![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : fz – f
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we suggest an indication composed of the elements whose authenticity seems to be most plausible: category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , fz – f |
||||||
b. 16-18
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
The error of FE (→GE,EE) in bar 16 is undeniable:
In all the aforementioned bars AI has only accents, without additional indications. Cf. bars 20-22. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , fz – f |
||||||
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , fz – f |
||||||
b. 34
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , fz – f |
||||||
b. 54
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
A possible error of the engraver of FE (→GE,EE) is indicated by the repeated category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , fz – f |