Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 10

composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor

Fingering written into FED

Fingering written into FES

No teaching fingering

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Annotations in FES

b. 11

composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor

..

Similarly as in bar 3, the original version of AI had to be also in [A], as the traces of deleting the treble and bass clefs – used for its notation – are visible in FE. Chopin introduced analogous changes also while repeating this phrases in bars 53 and 61.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 11

composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor

..

We add a cautionary  before b2. The sign was already introduced in GE2 (→GE3GE4GE5) and EE4.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 11

composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor

No signs in AI & FE (→GE1,EE2)

Three arpeggio signs in GE1a (→GE2GE3GE4GE5) & EE4

Arpeggio sign in EE3

..

According to us, arpeggio performance of the tenth chords stands beyond any doubt – it is proved by Chopin sign in bar 3, left almost certainly as a general indication concerning all analogous situations.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 11

composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor

No slurs in FE (→GE,EE2)

Slurs in EE3 (→EE4)

..

We complete the slurs after bar 3. The slurs were added also in EE3 (→EE4).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions