Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 38
|
composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major
..
The last note of the 1st half of the bar (b category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 40
|
composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major
..
In A (→FE) there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A |
|||||||||
|
b. 42-43
|
composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major
..
Lack of the pedal release mark depressed in the middle of bar 42 must be considered as the notation's inaccuracy in this context. The category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , No pedal release mark |
|||||||||
|
b. 52-53
|
composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major
..
Same as in bars 50-51, we consider the omission of the tie by the engraver of FE to be more plausible than Chopin's possible proofreading of FE. However, in this place a tie was added both in GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 53
|
composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major
..
In FE (→EE) the double flat was erroneously placed before the bottom note of the third. However, this patent inaccuracy was corrected only in GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |
) was corrected in 
raising d
in 
in 
