![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors in FE
b. 38
|
composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major
..
The last note of the 1st half of the bar (b category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 43-44
|
composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major
..
According to us, omission of the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||
b. 50-51
|
composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major
..
Oversight of the tie by the engraver of FE (→GE,EE) seems to be more plausible here than Chopin's possible proofreading in FE. Similarly in bars 52-53. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||
b. 52-53
|
composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major
..
Same as in bars 50-51, we consider the omission of the tie by the engraver of FE to be more plausible than Chopin's possible proofreading of FE. However, in this place a tie was added both in GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 53
|
composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major
..
In FE (→EE) the double flat was erroneously placed before the bottom note of the third. However, this patent inaccuracy was corrected only in GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |