mUltimate Chopin

Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : Errors in FE

b. 38

composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major

..

The last note of the 1st half of the bar (b) was corrected in A, while the effect of these changes turned out to be unclear for the engraver of FE who found there c1. The mistake was corrected both in GE and EE.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions

b. 43-44

composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major

 in A

No markings in FE (→GE,EE)
..

According to us, omission of the  marks in the editions is of accidental nature. Cf. bar 16, as well as the Etudes in Gmajor, No. 5, bar 32, F minor, No. 9, bar 4, C minor, No. 12, bar 27.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE

b. 50-51

composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major

Tie in A

No tie in FE (→GE,EE)
..

Oversight of the tie by the engraver of FE (→GE,EE) seems to be more plausible here than Chopin's possible proofreading in FE. Similarly in bars 52-53.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE

b. 52-53

composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major

Tie in A, GE & EE

No tie in FE
..

Same as in bars 50-51, we consider the omission of the tie by the engraver of FE to be more plausible than Chopin's possible proofreading of FE. However, in this place a tie was added both in GE and EE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions

b. 53

composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major

..

In FE (→EE) the double flat was erroneously placed before the bottom note of the third. However, this patent inaccuracy was corrected only in GE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions