Issues : EE revisions
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major
..
A lacking before the penultimate quaver is most probably a mistake by Chopin. The accidental was added by the revisers in both GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors of A |
|||||
b. 9
|
composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major
..
The fingering, added by Fontana in EE, repeats in both hands the schemes given by Chopin in bar 1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
b. 13
|
composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major
..
The lack of naturals before the sixth on the 6. quaver is an undoubted oversight by Chopin in A (→FE). The before the upper note was complemented in both GE and EE, however the one sharpening d2 to d2 was only added in GE2 (→GE3→GE4). The lack of the latter accidental also infuences the pitch of the penultimate quaver of the bar. This inaccuracy was noticed during the proofreading of FE (→GE,EE) where a was added before that quaver. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 16
|
composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major
..
In this context, the missing mark is undoubtedly a result of Chopin's inattention, who added pedalling in a proofreading of FE, or – which is more plausible – of the engraver implementing this proofreading. The mark was added both in GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , No pedal release mark |
|||||
b. 18
|
composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |