Page: 
Source: 
p. 2, b. 33-64
p. 1, b. 1-32
p. 2, b. 33-64
GE3 - Revised impression of GE2
Main text
A - Autograph
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Revised impression of GE2
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
FES - Stirling copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE3 - Revised impression of EE1
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Revised impression of GE2
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
FES - Stirling copy
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE3 - Revised impression of EE1
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF GE3 - Revised impression of GE2


  b. 33-34

A phrase mark in A

A curved line [slur] in GE1 (→FE) and GE3

No slur in GE2

A tie in EE

The phrase mark in  A, just like two further ones in analogous situations, embraces the motif that consists of two thirds a flat1-c2. The meaning of that curved line in GE1 (→FE) is no longer clear, as it could just as well be interpreted as a tie sustaining as1. This is at least how the reviewer of GE2 understood it, which is evidenced by the change made in bars 34-35. In the discussed place in GE2 the slur was omitted, probably with the intention to move the slur of GE1 up in order to turn it more clearly into a tie (it reappeared in GE3). The engraver of EE read the line to be a tie sustaining a flat1 and engraved it in a manner that left no room for doubt.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE, GE revisions

notation: Slurs