Issues : Inaccuracies in GE
b. 39
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
We determine the extent of the on the basis of A. In the editions, the hairpins become shorter and shorter, eventually to resemble a long accent in EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
b. 44
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
The dashes in A defining the extent of cresc. were omitted in GE1 (→FE→EE).They were supplemented in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
b. 45
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
In A, the hairpins lead to the next bar. In GE (→FE→EE) they only reach the 3rd crotchet of the bar. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
b. 46
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
In the main text we give the dynamic markings of A, reproduced also in GE2 (→GE3). In the remaining sources and the left end of are moved towards the beginning of the bar. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
b. 48
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
Chopin usually placed marks between notes, which was often incomprehensible to engravers. It is also the case here - in GE1 (→FE→EE) the sign was moved and placed under the 3rd crotchet. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE |