mUltimate Chopin

Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : Inaccuracies in FE

Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 50-51

composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor

 in A (→GE)

 in FE (→EE)
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in FE

b. 53

composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor

 
 
..  

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in FE

b. 54-55

composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor

 in A (→GE1)

 in FE (→EE) and GE2 (→GE3)
..

The mark   in A (→GE1) reaches the crotchet g1. In FE (→EE) it was reproduced inaccurately, its extent shortened by a quaver. A similar change was introduced in GE2 (→GE3); perhaps the ink blot at the end of the hairpins in A was interpreted as their shortening by Chopin.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions

b. 62

composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor

 in A

 in GE

 in FE (→EE)
..

The pedal release mark , placed at the end of the bar in A, was gradually moved to the left in subsequent editions (GE, FE and EE) so that it appeared earlier and earlier in the bar.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE

b. 63

composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor

A long accent in A (→GE)

A short accent in  FE (→EE)
..

The shape of the accent in A is typical for long accents and it was fairly accurately reproduced in GE. The mark in FE (→EE) had the form of a short accent, which must be considered an inaccuracy.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE