Page: 
Source: 
p. 4, b. 51-67
p. 1, b. 1-16
p. 2, b. 17-32
p. 3, b. 33-50
p. 4, b. 51-67
Main text
Main text
AI - Working autograph
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
EE - English edition
EE3 - Corrected impression of [EE2]
EE4 - Revised impression of EE3
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
AI - Working autograph
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
EE - English edition
EE3 - Corrected impression of [EE2]
EE4 - Revised impression of EE3
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 56

Less likely reading of slur in AI & A (→FEGE,EE)

More likely reading of slur in AI & A

Both in AI and A the slur beginning in this bar may be understood as embracing only the semiquavers or the entire motif. In FE (→GE,EE) it was the first possibility that was adopted, while according to the editors of mUltimate Chopin, it is the second one that is more likely – cf. bar 28.
The mark in AI is the only slur written in this manuscript from bar 37.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: FE1, A, AI, FE2, FED, FEJ, FES, GE1, GE2, GE3, GE4, EE3, EE4