Issues : EE revisions
b. 23-28
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
In EE the fingering is marked also in these bars. Fontana develops the composer's hints, yet he also suggests some unobvious solutions – cf. bar 22. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||||
b. 28
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
The earlier ending of the octave sign in FE (→GE) is a patent error, corrected by Chopin in FED and FES. Both autographs, as well as EE, have the correct text. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED , Annotations in FES |
|||||||
b. 29-32
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
The fingering in the L.H. in bars 29-31 was added by Chopin in a proofreading of FE (→GE,EE). In EE the indications of bar 31 were also repeated in bar 32. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||
b. 32
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
appearing under the part of the L.H. in FE (→GE1→GE2) is an evident error, corrected in EE and later GE,s. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||
b. 33-34
|
composition: Op. 10 No 9, Etude in F minor
..
We suggest complementing slurs analogously to motives in bars 29-30, partly added by Chopin while proofreading FE (→GE,EE). The sign in bar 33 was added in GE3 (→GE4) while EE has slurs in both bars. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |