Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 97-98
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
In GC (→GE1) the crotchets in the middle voice of the R.H. – both in bar 97 and the first in bar 98) – are written without the extending dots. The subsequent impressions of GE correct this patent oversight. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||||||||||
|
b. 99
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Placement of markings , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies |
|||||||||||
|
b. 103
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||||||||||
|
b. 108
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
GC overlooked the extending dots in the first chord of the 2nd half of bar. The error was corrected in GE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||||||||||
|
b. 108-111
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
In A, the L.H. slurring seems to be incomplete, since the motifs in bar 109 are provided with slurs, whereas the analogous motifs in the adjacent bars are not. Due to this reason, in the main text we suggest adding two respective slurs. GC and FE generally repeat the slurs of A; however, both sources reproduced the first slur in bar 109 inaccurately: in FE it begins (on a new line) as if it continued the slur from the previous bar, in which there is however no slur, whereas in GC the slur reaches up to g in the middle of the bar. Since these minor inaccuracies actually do not influence the performance, we consider them to be accidental, insignificant defects. The authentic slurs were arbitrarily prolonged both in GE and EE, differently in each source. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
in 
