Issues : Inaccuracies in FE
|
b. 145
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
Hairpins in both GC and FE are inaccurate – a sign written with too much impetus in GC, and a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 149
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
In GC (→GE) and FE there is no decresc. in the R.H. In A it is shorter than in analogous bars 141 and 145, yet there is no reason to differentiate between the places. A similar harmonisation of these hairpins was performed in EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Unclear hairpins in A , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||||||
|
b. 153-155
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
Discontinuous slurs in FE and EE are probably inaccurate due to the line breaks in A and FE. The engraver of FE presumably reproduced a slur over the last two bars in a line, what corresponds to bars 153-154 in A, but 154-155 in FE. The slurs in EE result most likely from misinterpretation of a slur which is notated over two lines in A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
|||||||||||
|
b. 174-175
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
In the first half of the bar, in A (→EE,GC→GE) the L.H. beam links all three quavers. In FE the first quaver is separated from the following two, what seems not to be the result of Chopin's correction. category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 176
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
In FE and GE the slur was moved under the dyads, which effectively changed its meaning – instead of embracing the c2-b1 motif, it indicates to hold f1. Moreover, both in GE and in EE, a similarly placed slur was arbitrarily added in the 2nd half of the bar. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , Placement of markings , GE revisions |
in 
