Issues : EE revisions
|
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
..
In FE the dot extending G was omitted, as a result of which the bar in the L.H. has only 11 semiquavers. It is either a simple oversight (cf. bar 26) or a result of a misunderstanding at the time of proofreading (the wrong dot was removed? – see the adjacent remark). The mistake was corrected both in GE and in EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
..
FE has e1 as the lower note of the 1st semiquaver. This rather obvious from the pianistic point of view error was corrected in GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
..
FE overlooks the dots extending the octave in the L.H. This patent error is absent in both A and the remaining editions. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 27
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 10 No 7, Etude in C major
..
The fingering, given by Chopin in a proofreading of FE (→GE), was, according to us, erroneously reproduced – the digits referring to the bottom notes, placed in the editions over the notes, were mistakenly printed two semiquavers late. In EE Fontana completed the fingering of the upper voice over the 9th and 10th semiquavers. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
