Rhythm
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
In A there are visible traces of the time signature's change: from to 2/4. This may mean that there was a working notation of the Etude in two-time longer rhythmic values (cf. bars 4-12 and 8). category imprint: Corrections & alterations issues: Changes of metre , Corrections in A |
|||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
The indications of triplets are our addition. The digits, together with the slurs, were also added in the entire bar in GE4 (→GE5). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 4-12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
In A d in bars 4 and 12 is a dotted minim. The mistake, corrected in FE (→GE,EE), probably stems from the original notation of the Etude in two-time longer rhythmic values. What is interesting is the fact that in bar 52 Chopin noticed and corrected this mistake while still writing A. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Rhythmic errors , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
In A the first chord in the L.H. is a crotchet. The possible mistake (theoretically it could be considered as a simplified two-voice notation) was corrected in FE (→GE,EE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Rhythmic errors , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 41-43
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
In bars 41 and 43 A has the original version of the rhythm, corrected by Chopin in FE (→GE,EE). Moreover, in bar 41 the notation of A is erroneous, as there are no dots next to the crotchet on the 2nd quaver in the bar extending its value. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Rhythmic errors , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |