![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors in EE
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
The cresc. indication was overlooked in EE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
|||||
b. 34-35
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
It seems to be highly unlikely that Chopin, at the time of adding
In the main text we suggest a solution stemming from the first possibility, as being closer to the source notation. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Centrally placed marks |
|||||
b. 56
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
In EE2 the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
|||||
b. 72-73
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
Lack of the tie sustaining d category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in EE , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 72
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »