



b. 81-82
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
In GE the crescendo indication was divided into syllables, which in this edition was a routine procedure in the case when the range of the indication was indicated with the dashes. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 83-84
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 83-84
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
Initially, Chopin wrote the part of the L.H. in A one octave too high. He also committed a mistake at the time of writing the part of the R.H. – he overlooked the a category imprint: Corrections & alterations issues: Corrections in A , Partial corrections |
||||||||
b. 83
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Centrally placed marks |
||||||||
b. 84
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
Chopin added the arpeggio while proofreading FE (→GE,EE). In GE the sign was also added before the chord in the R.H. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |