Issues : Inaccuracies in A

b. 9

composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major

No arpeggio signs in A (→FE)

Arpeggio signs in GE & EE

..

The omission of arpeggios in A (→FE) is probably a preview of the transition to the abbreviated notation used in subsequent bars. There is no doubt that Chopin did not want to change the notation here, not to mention the performance.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in A

b. 9

composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major

No mark in A

 in FE (→GE,EE

..

Lack of  in A is probably related to the partially simplified notation of this bar – cf. the remark concerning the missing arpeggios. The mark was added in FE (→GE,EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Inaccuracies in A

b. 33-34

composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major

 in A

Two  in FE

 in GE1

  twice in EE

  in GE2 (→GE3GE4)

Our suggestion

..

According to us, A presents the only reliable pedalling version of these bars and the following sections of the Etude. The versions included in the editions are probably a result of an error of FE, the attempt of its later correction by Chopin in the last proofing and the subsequent arbitrary additions by the revisers of GE and EE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , No pedal release mark , Inaccuracies in A

b. 35

composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major

No markings in A

Arpeggio signs in FE (→GE,EE

..

The missing arpeggios in the R.H. in A are certainly Chopin's oversight.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Inaccuracies in A