Page: 
Source: 
p. 4, b. 51-68
p. 1, b. 1-18
p. 2, b. 19-33
p. 3, b. 34-50
p. 4, b. 51-68
p. 5, b. 69-84
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
EE - English edition
EE3 - Corrected impression of [EE2]
EE4 - Revised impression of EE3
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
EE - English edition
EE3 - Corrected impression of [EE2]
EE4 - Revised impression of EE3
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 63-65

Long accents in A (→FE)

Short accents in GE

Different accents in EE

The accents in the R.H. at the beginning of these bars, despite their unimpressive size, display a form which is characteristic rather of long accents. The marks in FE, and in bar 63 also in EE, may also be considered as long. In the remaining situations, we see short accents in the sources.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: FE1, FE2, FED, FEJ, FES, A, GE1, GE2, GE3, GE4, EE3, EE4