Page: 
Source: 
p. 5, b. 69-84
p. 1, b. 1-18
p. 2, b. 19-33
p. 3, b. 34-50
p. 4, b. 51-68
p. 5, b. 69-84
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
EE - English edition
EE3 - Corrected impression of [EE2]
EE4 - Revised impression of EE3
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
EE - English edition
EE3 - Corrected impression of [EE2]
EE4 - Revised impression of EE3
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 78

 in A

Possible interpretation of A

 in FE (→GE,EE

The interpretation of the  mark written in A presents a number of problems. It undoubtedly concerns the part of the R.H., in fact, only one note – d2. Therefore, it could be considered as a kind of reversed long accent. The  hairpins visible in FE (→GE,EE) actually have a similar meaning and they were not questioned by Chopin at the time of proofreading, thus we adopt them in the main text.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: FE1, FE2, FED, FEJ, FES, A, GE1, GE2, GE3, GE4, EE3, EE4