![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Inaccuracies in FE
b. 77-81
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
The category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||
b. 79-81
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
Lack of staccato dots at the beginning of bars 79 and 81 in the editions is most probably a result of negligence of the engraver of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||
b. 80
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
The value of minim, given to the bottom note of the c1-f1 fourth in FE (→GE,EE), is most probably erroneous. In the main text we give the written in A crotchet, which we however write with a separate stem in order to avoid ambiguity. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Different values of chord components , Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||
b. 83-84
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
The difference between dots and wedges in A is very clear, yet it was not included in FE (→GE). Taking into account numerous inaccuracies of the notation of staccato marks in FE, we give preference to the detailed indications of A. In EE all dots were omitted. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in EE , Authentic corrections of FE , Wedges |
|||||||||
b. 83
|
composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
Same as in the case of category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |