Issues : Authentic corrections of FE

b. 18

composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor

No indication in A & GE

in FE (→EE)

..

Lack of dim. both in A and GE most probably means that Chopin added it in the last proofreading of FE (→EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 18

composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor

No accidental in A

Natural in FE (→GE,EE)

..

Lack of the  returning is most probably Chopin's oversight here. The composer's concentration may have decreased when, after the chromatised bar 17, he reached the diatonic progression in the main key. In any case, the accidental added in a proofreading of FE (→GE,EE) must be considered to be binding. Similarly in bar 58.  

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 20-23

composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor

No slurs in A

Slur in FE (→GE,EE)

Our suggestion

..

The slur over the motif in the R.H. in bars 22-23 was probably added by Chopin at the time of proofreading FE (→GE,EE). According to us, the lack of a similar addition over the first motif is an inaccuracy of notation, hence in the main text we suggest a suitable addition.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 20

composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor

No indication in A & GE

in FE (→EE)

..

Chopin most probably added the sotto voce indication during the last proofreading of FE (→EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 23-24

composition: Op. 10 No 12, Etude in C minor

No slur in A

Slur in FE (→GE,EE

..

Chopin most probably added the R.H. slur at the time of proofreading FE (→GE,EE). Cf. bars 20-23.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Authentic corrections of FE