Issues : Long accents
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The accent sign in FE is clearly different than in bars 1-2. Most probably, according to Chopin's intentions, it was supposed to be a long accent. Both in GE and in EE it was rendered as a casual short accent. In GE4 (→GE5) the sign was omitted, which was probably a mistake. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in GE |
||||||||
b. 38-40
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The accents in bars 38 and 40 in FE (→GE1) have a form suggesting the use of long accents by Chopin. In EE2 (→EE3) the signs were omitted. In the remaining editions common short accents were given. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Errors in EE |
||||||||
b. 56
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The accent in FE, most probably a long one, was added in GE and EE as a short one. In the main text we give a long accent, as in analogous bar 8. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||||
b. 60
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
In the main text we give the long accent featured in FE (→GE1). The short accent remains in a few editions; it could be a result of a misunderstanding of this aspect of Chopin's notation. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||||
b. 64
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
Two accents in the 2nd half of the bar have the form of long accents in FE, which we adopt to the main text. GE and EE3 (→EE4) have short accents (in EE2 the signs were omitted). category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in EE |