Issues : Errors of CLI
|
b. 3
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of CLI |
|||||
|
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The b3 note on the last semiquaver of CLI and EE could be easily considered as a mistake except for the fact that in analogous bar 53 the sources have the same text. Therefore, it cannot be excluded that in CLI we are dealing with the original version, while in EE with the editor's revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Main-line changes , Errors of CLI |
|||||
|
b. 5-6
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
In CLI the G1-G octave in bar 5 is a semibreve, while the D1-D octave in bar 6 – a minim. It seems to be highly unlikely for this obvious error to be included in [AI]. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Rhythmic errors , Errors of CLI |
|||||
|
b. 23-24
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
According to us, lack of the bass' octave strengthening in CLI is not the original version, but rather the copyist's error (overseeing two 8s indicating lower octaves). Such abbreviated notation of the octaves in this place is included in FE (→GE). category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Abbreviated octaves' notation , Errors of CLI |
|||||
|
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
CLI has g category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors of CLI |
1 as the 1st note of the last group of semiquavers. It is hard to assume that Chopin could have committed such a striking mistake.