Issues : Errors of CLI
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 27-28
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
CLI is missing the lower note of the sustained octave. Most probably the copyist forgot to write 8 under both Gs. In EE2 there are no ties sustaining the octave, which is probably a mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of CLI |
||||||||
b. 33-34
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
CLI has a sustained B as a bass note in these bars. This is the original version, moreover, it was almost certainly written with an error – same as in the adjacent bars, it was the B1-B octave that was supposed to be in this place (cf. e.g. bars 3 or 23-24). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Accompaniment changes , Errors of CLI |
||||||||
b. 35-36
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
In CLI the lack of hold of the bass octave is most probably the copyist's error. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of CLI |
||||||||
b. 38
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The third of CLI, impossible from the pianistic point of view, is certainly a result of the copyist's distraction, who forgot to erase the erroneously written d1. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors of CLI |
||||||||
b. 48
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
According to us, g in CLI is not an earlier version, yet a copyist's error, who routinely repeated the accidental of the previous figures. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of CLI |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »