mUltimate Chopin

Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : Main-line changes

Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 64

composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major

E-C in CLI

D-B in FE (→GE,EE) 
..

The version of FE (→GE,EE) adopted in the main text includes undeniable harmonic improvements in comparison with the original text of CLI. Similarly to bars 5 and 60, the incentive to introduce the changes could stem from the willingness to avoid parallel fifths in combination with the next chord.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Main-line changes

b. 71

composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major

f2 in CLI

g2 in FE (→GE,EE) 
..

The version of CLI is the original one, drawn from [AI]. It is confirmed by the traces of deleting f2 visible in FE. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Main-line changes

b. 75

composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major

B in CLI

C in FE (→GE,EE) 
..

The first note of the 2nd group of semiquavers in CLI is b1, similarly as in the 4th group there is a b3. The head of the note opening the 3rd group is illegible, but both the length of the stem and the figuration's logic indicate on b2 as the intended pitch of the note. In the main text we give the undoubtedly improved version of FE (→GE,EE).

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Main-line changes