|
b. 25-26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
CLI is missing a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Cautionary accidentals |
||||||||
|
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
CLI has g category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors of CLI |
||||||||
|
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
CLI has d2, d1 and d as the 4th, 8th and 12th note respectively. It is the original version, probably changed by Chopin only during a proofreading of FE (a clear sign of deleting a note in print can be seen only where the d note is). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Main-line changes |
||||||||
|
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The d note as a dotted minim appears only in FE, which most probably means that Chopin introduced it here instead of a semibreve only during a proofreading. Overseeing this change in EE may be explained with a mistake, revision or existence of another phase of FE's proofreading, not included in EE. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 27-37
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The fingering in bars 27-30, 32-35 and 37 from FE (→GE,EE) adopted in the main text is certainly authentic (see however bar 27). In EE Fontana completed it in bar 36, according to the fingering resulting from Chopin's indications in the previous bar. category imprint: Differences between sources |
before g1 in bar 25. A relevant sign before c3 in bar 26 is present in all sources.
1 as the 1st note of the last group of semiquavers. It is hard to assume that Chopin could have committed such a striking mistake.
