mUltimate Chopin

Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Page: 
Source: 
p. 5, b. 39-49
p. 1, b. 1-8
p. 2, b. 9-18
p. 3, b. 19-28
p. 4, b. 29-38
p. 5, b. 39-49
Main text
Main text
CLI - Copy by Linowski
Ap - Presentation autograph
FE - French edition
FEcor - Chopin's FE proof
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Corrected impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
GE5 - Fifth German edition
EE - English edition
EE2 - Second impression of [EE1]
EE3 - Corrected impression of EE2
EE4 - Revised impression of EE3
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
CLI - Copy by Linowski
Ap - Presentation autograph
FE - French edition
FEcor - Chopin's FE proof
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Corrected impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
GE5 - Fifth German edition
EE - English edition
EE2 - Second impression of [EE1]
EE3 - Corrected impression of EE2
EE4 - Revised impression of EE3
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text

  b. 44

No mark in CLI, EE2 & GE3 (→GE4→GE5)

Long accent in Ap, FEcor & EE3 (→EE4)

 in FE (→GE1→GE2) 

According to us, the mark written by Chopin in FEcor is a long accent, same as in analogous bar 17. An unequivocal long accent is also in Ap. In FE (→GE1→GE2) the mark was interpreted as  hairpins, which, in this case, cannot be considered as an inaccuracy. In EE2 and GE3 (→GE4→GE5) the sign was omitted, whereas in EE3 (→EE4) a long (!?) accent was added.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents, EE revisions, Errors in EE, Errors in GE

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: GE1
Complete ➔