![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Inaccuracies in FE
b. 1-5
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
Chopin wrote the cresc. indications in bars 1 and 5 in FEcor, at the second time he also wrote the dashes determining the scope of the dynamic change (similarly in bar 9). The dashes were, however, not included in FE (→GE,EE). It is most probably an oversight, quite often in first editions of Chopin's works (cf., e.g., the Impromptu in A category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In the main text, according to the entries written by Chopin himself in FEcor and Ap, we give the long accent mark over the 2nd crotchet in the L.H. In FE (→GE,EE) it was given a form of a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||||
b. 9-10
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
The category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In the main text we give a long accent on the basis of Ap and a handwritten Chopin's entry in FEcor. The engraver of FE (→GE,EE) totally misunderstood Chopin's sign, reproducing it as category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
b. 17
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
The undeniable long accent, written by Chopin in FEcor, was reproduced in FE (→GE,EE) as category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE |