![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Long accents
b. 3
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
It is not clear how to understand the signs shaped in the form of accents visible in Ap at the end of bars 3 and 4. Therefore, in both places we offer alternative interpretations. A similar problem appears in analogous bars 11-12, 38 and 39. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
|||||||||
b. 4
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
The category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in FE , Sign reversal |
|||||||||
b. 4
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
The accent visible in FE (→GE,EE) should be rather interpreted as a short one, yet in FE even shorter signs were used, e.g., in the Etude in C major, No. 1, bars 1-2. Also the sign put in Ap (next to category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
|||||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In the main text, according to the entries written by Chopin himself in FEcor and Ap, we give the long accent mark over the 2nd crotchet in the L.H. In FE (→GE,EE) it was given a form of a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||
b. 11
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
Same as in analogous bars 3-4, we propose an alternative interpretation of the short category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |