Verbal indications
|
b. 35-36
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In the main text we reproduce the articulation marking written by Chopin in FEcor. In finished FE and the remaining sources the inscription fits in bar 35. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 35
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
The indications of Ap constitute a continuation of category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 42-43
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In the version prepared for printing Chopin did not use the dynamic hairpins he wrote in Ap (also in the next bar). In one of the last proofreadings of FE (→GE,EE) he, however, added a verbal indication. In the main text we suggest to extend the marked range of the indication, as there is no doubt that crescendo leads to category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 43
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 45
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In the main text we give the last sempre legato written in here by Chopin in FEcor (→FE→GE,EE). Cf. bars 19-21. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
in 
from bar 32 and in the final dynamic concept given by us, they seem to be superfluous.
