mUltimate Chopin

Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : Errors of CLI

b. 33-34

composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor

No ties in CLI

Ties in Ap & FE (→GE,EE) 
..

In CLI the E-e octave is not sustained to the next bar, which is probably a mistake. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors of CLI

b. 36

composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor

..

In CLI there are no naturals returning a1, d2 and f2. The accidentals were also absent in FEcor, in which Chopin, however, added all of them. Eventually, both FE (→GE,EE) and Ap have the correct notation.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors of CLI

b. 37

composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor

No  in CLI

Natural in Ap & FE (→GE,EE) 
..

Lack of the  returning b2 on the penultimate semiquaver is most probably an inaccuracy of notation of CLI. Chopin added the accidental in FEcor.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Errors of CLI

b. 39

composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor

..

In CLI and FEcor the  returning d1 on the 4th beat of the bar was overlooked, which is a patent error.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors of CLI

b. 40

composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor

..

In CLI there are no naturals returning a1 and d2. The accidentals were also originally absent in FEcor, in which Chopin added both these two naturals and a third one returning f2 on the last semiquaver in the lower voice. Eventually, both FE (→GE,EE) and Ap have the correct notation.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors of CLI