![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Long accents
b. 20-22
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In Ap long accents on the 4th beat of bars 20 and 22 seem to be significantly related to the rhythmic values – both in the L.H. and in the lower voice of the right one the autograph features crotchets. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||||
b. 25-26
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
The clearly long accents, written by Chopin in FEcor, were recreated in FE (→GE,EE) as short ones. Ap has even characteristic category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
b. 27-28
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 27-28
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
It is not clear whether the accents in Ap are supposed to concern both hands or only the octaves in the L.H. We also conserve the significant difference in the accents' length, although its meaning is unclear. The signs – also those on the 4th beat of the bar – are not included in FE (→GE,EE), in which Chopin decided to mark a broader dynamic change. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||||
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
The unequivocal long accent, written by Chopin in FEcor, was erroneously recreated as a diminuendo mark in FE (→GE,EE). Although the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE |