![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Long accents
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In the main text we give a long accent on the basis of Ap and a handwritten Chopin's entry in FEcor. The engraver of FE (→GE,EE) totally misunderstood Chopin's sign, reproducing it as category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
Same as in analogous bars 3-4, we propose an alternative interpretation of the short category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
|||||||||||
b. 17
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
The undeniable long accent, written by Chopin in FEcor, was reproduced in FE (→GE,EE) as category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||||
b. 17
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
Our proposal (long accent) constitutes a resultant of undeniable elements of two sources including independently written indications in this place – Ap and FE (→GE,EE). We do not consider category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
b. 19
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In the main text we do not consider the accent underlining the beginning of the new section in Ap. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |