Page: 
Source: 
p. 4, b. 41-52
p. 1, b. 1-14
p. 2, b. 15-28
p. 3, b. 29-40
p. 4, b. 41-52
p. 5, b. 53-66
p. 6, b. 67-79
p. 7, b. 80-95
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
EE - English edition
EE3 - Corrected impression of [EE2]
EE4 - Revised impression of EE3
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
EE - English edition
EE3 - Corrected impression of [EE2]
EE4 - Revised impression of EE3
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 49-50

Possible slur in A

Slur in FE (→GE,EE)

Slurs suggested by the editors

It is not clear whether a slightly oblique line in A going from the last crotchet of bar 49 to the second beat of bar 50 is a slur, nor what the extent of that possible slur should be. In the main text we give the slur from FE (→GE,EE) and suggest adding another one modeled on the sign written in A in the analogous bar 48.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A, Authentic corrections of FE

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: A, FE1, FE2, FED, FEJ, FES, EE3, EE4, GE1, GE2, GE3, GE4