mUltimate Chopin

Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Page: 
Source: 
p. 1, b. 1-14
p. 1, b. 1-14
p. 2, b. 15-28
p. 3, b. 29-40
p. 4, b. 41-52
p. 5, b. 53-66
p. 6, b. 67-79
p. 7, b. 80-95
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
EE - English edition
EE3 - Corrected impression of [EE2]
EE4 - Revised impression of EE3
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
EE - English edition
EE3 - Corrected impression of [EE2]
EE4 - Revised impression of EE3
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link Main text

  b. 8

No slur in A (→FE→GE,EE3)

Slur in EE4

Our suggestion

In this context, lack of the slur over the semiquavers in the R.H. must be considered as Chopin's inaccuracy, which is justified by the revision introduced in EE4.

See b. 2-6

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: A, FE1, FE2, FED, FEJ, FES, EE3, EE4, GE1, GE2, GE3, GE4
Complete ➔