Page: 
Source: 
p. 3, b. 29-40
p. 1, b. 1-14
p. 2, b. 15-28
p. 3, b. 29-40
p. 4, b. 41-52
p. 5, b. 53-66
p. 6, b. 67-79
p. 7, b. 80-95
EE3 - Corrected impression of [EE2]
Main text
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
EE - English edition
EE3 - Corrected impression of [EE2]
EE4 - Revised impression of EE3
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
EE - English edition
EE3 - Corrected impression of [EE2]
EE4 - Revised impression of EE3
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF EE3 - Corrected impression of [EE2]


  b. 30-34

No slurs in A (→FE)

Slurs in GE

EE

Our suggestion

Omission of the slurs in the L.H. in bars 30 and 34 must be considered as Chopin's inaccuracy, as in bars 32 and 36 the slurs are present in A. Therefore, we suggest to complete the slurring on the basis of comparison with similar motifs in bars 2, 6 and analog. The additions – on a similar basis, yet with different results – were performed both in GE and EE.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions, GE revisions

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: A, FE1, FE2, FED, FEJ, FES, EE3, EE4, GE1, GE2, GE3, GE4