Issues : Errors in EE
b. 4-6
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
In the main text we give the fingering of the L.H., written by Chopin in A. In FE (→GE) the '3' digit was overlooked in bar 5, which is almost certainly an oversight. In EE Fontana completed the fingering at the beginning of bar 5, adding digits for each note. EE3 erroneously features '2' as the 1st digit in bar 4 (it may be a mistake related to the transcription of the "continental" fingering system to the "British" one – cf. General Editorial Principles, p. 10). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in EE |
|||||||
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
|||||||
b. 56
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
The slurs of EE are probably the engraver's error resulting from different division of the text into great staves. The erroneous slurs were repeated also in the part of the L.H. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
|||||||
b. 89
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
The fingering given in EE at the beginning of the 2nd half of the bar is certainly erroneous (most probably the engraver mistakenly repeated here the set of digits from the previous group of semiquavers). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |