Issues : Inaccuracies in A
b. 35-36
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
Lack of accents is most probably Chopin's oversight, who omitted here also slurs. Cf. bars 7-8. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in A |
|||
b. 41-42
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
In both bars in A (→FE), there are no accidentals before the last note of the 2nd group of semiquavers. These patent oversights were completed in GE and EE. The sharps are also written in pencil in FES. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Annotations in FES , Inaccuracies in A |
|||
b. 51
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
In A (→FE) there is no accidental before the 4th semiquaver. There is no reason to doubt that it is a typical of Chopin inaccuracy, resulting from the rules of validity of the accidentals, which in fact were not fully established in Chopin's notation. It is confirmed by the written in this place in FED. In spite of this, in GE1 (→GE2) there is a before this note, which is certainly a mistake. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FED , Accidentals in different octaves , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
|||
b. 94
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Inaccuracies in A |