Issues : EE revisions
b. 19
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
In EE Fontana repeated here the fingering from bar 5. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 25-28
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
Random fingering of A was completed in details by Chopin in a proofreading of FE (→GE,EE). In EE, Fontana added fingering indications also to the 2nd half of bar 27. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
Nothing indicates that three naturals raising B to B and b2(1) to b2(1), added in EE could be authentic. The reviser probably relied on bars 11-12. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 29-36
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
Chopin's fingering given in the main text – in bar 29 in the R.H., in bar 30 in the L.H. – was added in a proofreading of FE. It was also reproduced in GE, yet inaccurately – the 3rd digit in bar 29 was omitted. In EE Fontana completed the indications in the entire 8-bar section after similar passages in bars 1-8. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||
b. 30-34
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
Omission of the slurs in the L.H. in bars 30 and 34 must be considered as Chopin's inaccuracy, as in bars 32 and 36 the slurs are present in A. Therefore, we suggest to complete the slurring on the basis of comparison with similar motifs in bars 2, 6 and analog. The additions – on a similar basis, yet with different results – were performed both in GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |